# 第6章：共识机制详解

Aegis-Graph 的最终审计结论是 **MARS 集群共识握手** 的结果。本章详细介绍智能体如何通过协议解决冲突并发布主权证明。

## ⚖️ 加权投票模型

每个智能体（视觉、图谱、逻辑）根据其证据强度贡献投票权重：

| 智能体         | 核心指标  | 基础权重 |
| ----------- | ----- | ---- |
| **视觉 (VF)** | 凭证保真度 | 0.30 |
| **图谱 (GN)** | 机构地位  | 0.35 |
| **逻辑 (LA)** | 时间一致性 | 0.35 |

## 🤝 握手协议流程

1. **并行审计**：智能体各自执行专项核验。
2. **冲突检测**：如果 VF 标记高风险但 GN 发现高权威机构，将触发共识冲突。
3. **思维链 (CoT) 仲裁**：逻辑审计员启动 CoT 推理，最终判定审计结论。

***

*返回* [*文档首页*](/atlanta-college-of-liberal-arts-and-sciences/readme.md)


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://atlanta-college-of-liberal-arts.gitbook.io/atlanta-college-of-liberal-arts-and-sciences/zhong-wen-zh/chapter6.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.